Housing policies were blasted by a succession of speakers at a buy-to-let event in Westminster yesterday.
Flagship schemes such as Funding for Lending, NewBuy and FirstBuy all came under fire.
Valerie Bannister, national property director of Your Move and vice president of ARLA, also slammed the lack of general direction.
She said: “Successive governments without a long-term housing strategy have got us into the situation we are now in, and the private rental sector is expected to pick up the shortfall.”
John Heron, managing director of specialist lender Paragon Mortgages, said: “Politicians are tinkering around at the edges and seeking headlines.
“They are being schizophrenic. On the one hand, they are doing everything they can to drive lenders away from high-risk lending, On the other hand, they are coming up with initiatives encouraging 95% mortgages on new-builds to first-time buyers.”
At the inaugural Great Buy to Let Debate, organised by the Wriglesworth consultancy, both he and other speakers called for a root and branch review of all government policies.
Richard Lambert, chief executive of the National Landlords Association, said that such a review should go beyond politics and form a “much bigger national debate” as to what we want of housing over the next 20 years.
Lambert said that we were at the start of what looked like a major movement in the way Britain houses itself. He said it was not inconceivable that 40% of the population would never be able to afford to enter home ownership from their own resources.
Some speakers suggested that people were turning to private renting because they preferred the flexibility of the lifestyle. But Professor Michael Ball poured scorn on this idea.
He said it was “basic economics” that people would want to buy their own houses if they could, to take advantage of rising equity. One reason why people hadn’t been so keen to buy in the last five years was because they could see that house prices were going down.
Elsewhere in the debate, speakers acknowledged that buy-to-let mortgage rates are much higher than for residential mortgages, despite a lower risk.
Heron said that the risk was “demonstrably lower’ than for the rest of the market, but said that buy-to-let cases were a commercial proposition, requiring “a costly and extensive underwriting process”.
.png)
Comments