No fewer than 14 different tax changes targeted mostly at the buy to let sector will damage the market in 2016 according to leading business consultancy KPMG.
Dermot Callinan, head of private clients at KPMG, says the changes - implemented or announced over the past four years - combine to make the economics of the sector “less and less attractive.”
He says that experience so far suggests that the majority of individual landlords have opted to pay the higher taxes than invest differently.
He adds that in the short term this may stay the same, with a possible rush to invest in rental properties before the additional three per cent stamp duty comes in on buy to let and second home properties above £40,000 in April.
“However, following its implementation and on top of a number of other measures phased in from 2017 onwards such as landlords facing a restriction in their ability to offset mortgage interest, it will be interesting to see whether buy to let investors opt to keep property portfolios or sell up ahead of the further changes coming in to force” he cautions.
“If large numbers of landlords take the decision to sell leading to a significant amount of second hand stock being put up for sale, this will certainly have an impact on the housing market and could also cause problems for some developers reliant on investors to maintain the current rate of sale.”
Added to this, Callinan warns that if fewer buy to let properties are available thereby creating a squeeze on the market, there is also the risk that these changes could result in high rental rates as landlords seek to compensate for increased costs.
“While a number of the tax changes have been highlighted as major revenue raisers for the government, the thinking behind them is also to deter some from investing property in order to leave more opportunities for owner-occupiers to get onto the housing ladder. Whether these changes achieve the Government’s policy aims remains to be seen, but these measures may well dampen demand for the kind of properties that are marketed as buy to let investments in the medium to long-term."
A well known specialist mortgage lender for the buy to let...
Private landlords’ net income has risen 39 per cent in the...
A new study of landlords reveals that far more believe they...
Buy to let landlords may be forced to raise rents or...
The predictions game can be tricky. Sometimes you just don’t know...
Leading UK property auctioneer Bond Wolfe has broken through the £100...
Uncertainty triggered by the new Labour Government and taxation concerns that...
B-hive Block Management Partners Celebrates Major Milestone With Over 100 Businesses...
We’re absolutely delighted to announce that, after 10 years, we’re able...
You don’t have to simply accept things as they are when...
%20-%20IMAGE%20Client%20Accounting%20%E2%80%93%20what%20are%20your%20options.jpg)
The benefits for letting agents to outsource their client accounting is...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
The Government has a hidden agenda. There real goal is to solve the housing shortage by encouraging institutional build to let, get rid of the pesky individual landlord (and their agent) and regulate the sector.
The outcome will be a more Germanic housing market with most people living in rental accommodation until they can afford a family home which they never sell, happy days! The thing that bothers me is the utter hypocrisy of introducing these changes,which piece the heart of Conservative values, as a way of increasing home ownership when it will do the reverse.
For most people, buying property to let has been a godsend and their only and last way of achieving a measure of financial freedom and independence. This government wants to take it away and replace it with.........nothing, perhaps their be motto should be 'malaise forever' oh no, they can't use that, wasn't it copyright to Jimmy Carter!
It is true that the current government policy does appear to be an attack on the middle classed landlords that require lending. Whereas those with high amounts of cash are not so badly affected (i.e. 'old money' & 'multinational company'). A higher tax on rental profits would be far fairer than disallowing interest as a deduction against tax (as it seriously affect highly geared Landlord/investors).
If the government do intend to promote institutional build to let, they should consider how poorly institutional investor deal with commercial property market and the state of our town centre due to them not adjusting rents to reflect the effect of online trading. They appear to respond very slowly to empty property whereas small scales Landlord respond quickly. On the whole Landlords provide a good service to tenants.
Please login to comment