The cost of living crisis could have a ‘catastrophic’ impact on homelessness unless an immediate eviction ban is introduced.
That’s the view of a group of experts from the housing, homelessness, health and political sectors - led by a government adviser who used to be Britain’s top civil servant.
The Kerslake Commission’s latest report assesses the steps made towards ending rough sleeping in England and considers the impact of the current economic crisis.
The commission - chaired by the former Head of the Civil Service Lord Bob Kerslake – is an independent group of 36 experts from the health, housing and homelessness sectors, including people with so-called ‘lived experience’ as well as representatives from local and national government.
It operates independently of the government but the latest report includes involvement from the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; its report is one of many sent to the government in an advisory capacity.
The report recommends:
- Reintroducing a temporary ban on evictions, as seen during the pandemic, to ensure that no one is made homeless as a result of the cost of living crisis – mirroring what was announced in Scotland earlier this month;
- Increasing the benefit cap and bringing benefits in line with inflation immediately – not in April 2023 as planned;
- Raising local housing allowances so that so they are in line with the bottom 30 per cent of the market.
Lord Kerslake says: “This Commission was formed in the wake of the Covid-19 crisis and we have seen much progress and excellent work … However, two years on from the pandemic we are facing a new crisis. The cause may be different by it the response must be equally urgent.
“The new Prime Minister has already announced plans to cap average household energy bills at £2,500 a year from next month. And this, while welcome, is not enough.
“Even with this help thousands of people are still facing the very real prospect of losing their homes because they are struggling to manage. The devastating effect this is having can be clearly seen in the testimonies of people who so kindly shared their personal experience with The Commission.
“We once again need to see the strong, decisive leadership from the Government we did during ‘Everyone In’, backed by resources and funding.
“But this time the focus must be two pronged. It is no longer just about getting people off the streets, it is about ensuring people who are currently at risk of homelessness don’t end up on them.
“Failure to act could see this become a homelessness as well as an economic crisis and the results could be catastrophic; with all the good achieved in reducing street homelessness since the pandemic lost, and any hope of the Government meeting its manifesto pledge to end rough sleeping by 2024 gone.”
The Kerslake Commission convened in March 2021 to examine the lessons from the public health emergency response to rough sleeping during the pandemic, and to understand how the significant progress made can be embedded in the longer term.
It has previously published two reports and will publish a further report in 2023.
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
We have a very generous social and economical support system which if administered properly, UC, would have a much more direct impact on what it’s supposed to do and help to avoid the main reason for 95% evictions and embed misappropriation of funds.
This influence should be directed at improvement and education not simply seek to stair the social conscious!
Well done, Kerslake. You are making it more likely that landlords will sell up and/or not take on tenants who are not able to qualify for rent guarantee insurance.
Unfortunately activists are wanting to capture landlords and use them to provide for their feckless friends. Trying to stop lls selling up and making them responsible for societys ills.
Homeowner working guarantors are the future now in a world when governments want private individuals to carry others
I find it hard to believe, when wages/salaries have also been rising and many firms have very generously given many of their staff one off hand outs, that employed young tenants in the main would not be able to temporarily soak up what probably only amounts to about 3-4% extra net inflationary pressure no different to the rest of us.
Those that do suffer genuine hardship in being able to do so, should be supported by the welfare state, and these applications should be fast tracked, albeit private tenants who arent on benefits who are down to their last couple of hundred £, and fear they need this eviction protection, have got far greater problems that have nothing to do with inflation. The rest will simply have to dip into the Ibiza23/footyseasonticket/everyfridaynightoutwiththelads/everysatnightcurrywiththemrs fund instead.
Please login to comment