A landlord has been fined £550 after failing to take action from a prohibition order issued by a council.
West Lindsey authority issued the order in November requiring the landlord’s property to be improved or vacated by December 2015 due to its poor condition and the need for remedial works to be undertaken.
Inspections by council officers found that the property was still being let despite the order being in place and the required improvements not being made.
The landlord, Richard Barratt, was fined £550 - the council says the fine could have been £830 but was reduced for the early guilty plea. He was also ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £56 and the council’s costs of £335.
A spokeswoman for the council says this is “an excellent result.”
The council introduced a Selective Licensing Scheme for part of its area earlier this month, requiring every property to let to have a five-year licence, costing £375.
The authority says failure to have a licence will be a criminal offence and will result in prosecution with fines of up to £20,000. Once issued, failure to comply with the conditions of the licence can also lead to a fine of up to £5,000.
A buy to let investor has received a hefty fine “for...
A Prohibition Order has been served on the owner of a...
The landlord of an overcrowded flat which lacked proper fire precautions...
A landlord faces a bill of over £9,000 for putting his...
The predictions game can be tricky. Sometimes you just don’t know...
Leading UK property auctioneer Bond Wolfe has broken through the £100...
Uncertainty triggered by the new Labour Government and taxation concerns that...
B-hive Block Management Partners Celebrates Major Milestone With Over 100 Businesses...
We’re absolutely delighted to announce that, after 10 years, we’re able...
You don’t have to simply accept things as they are when...
%20-%20IMAGE%20Client%20Accounting%20%E2%80%93%20what%20are%20your%20options.jpg)
The benefits for letting agents to outsource their client accounting is...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Who are you and what does it say on...
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
How ridiculous that an early plea reduces the penalty. The law in this case is an ass and the functionary who made the decision to reduce the fine level should go.
Please login to comment