Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell has made a clear pledge to tighten regulations surrounding the private rental sector.
In an interview with The Guardian newspaper McDonnell says: “Landlord licensing is not fit for purpose and the problem of rogue landlords is extensive. We need an effective scheme, local authorities that are properly resourced and improved tenants’ rights.
“We [Labour] are running a consultation to consolidate the powers available to local authorities and I would be in support of a national licensing scheme, in order to make regulation consistent for all landlords across the country and to stop the rogues from switching local authorities.”
Research undertaken by The Guardian claims that some 44 local authorities operate selective licensing schemes, almost all of them on specific parts of their overall boundary and not on the entire rental stock within their jurisdiction.
It says that some rogue landlords who may have been banned from operating in one area switch their activities and buy in other locations where they are free to own and let units.
In recent months Labour has been increasingly pro-active about the private rental sector.
It says it would scrap S21 of the 1998 Housing Act which, it claims, came into force when it was more difficult for landlords to evict people who paid rent on time; now, the party says, it is the biggest single cause of homelessness thanks to what it calls ‘no fault evictions’.
The party cites research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research asserting that 80 per cent of private sector evictions in 2016 fell into this category.
It also echoes the government in calling for three-year tenancies as standard for private tenants, banning the levying of letting agents’ fees on tenants in England and Wales, and new minimum legal standards to ensure homes are fit for human habitation - the latter two measures are already making their way through Parliament.
%20-%20IMAGE%20Client%20Accounting%20%E2%80%93%20what%20are%20your%20options.jpg)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
"It (the Guardian) says that some rogue landlords who may have been banned from operating in one area switch their activities and buy in other locations where they are free to own and let units."
This is an example of exaggeration for the sake of emphasis. Landlords who buy in other areas face punitive costs which far outweigh any profit they may be able to make in another area. Just add up the costs of selling and then buying and this whole statement becomes a complete nonsense.
I agree rogue landlords should be removed from the scene along with agents who should know better. Come on now who worked this lot out and where is there proof?
Another example of poor news or is it fake news?
How do Rogue's " switch Local Authorities then ? "
Do they sell up their sub-standard property in one area - purely because licensing has been introduced, and buy another property in a #non-licensed ' area.
Not a lot going on 'between the ears' is there.
Please login to comment